MM5和ETA相似理论近地层方案对农田下垫面通量模拟比较研究

Comparative study of the similarity surface layer schemes simulate turbulent flux simulations over cropland between MM5 and ETA

  • 摘要: 近地层湍流通量计算对于中尺度数值模式有重要意义,湍流通量的参数化是当前大气边界层研究的重要课题之一.选择青藏高原东缘大理观象台边界层通量观测系统,离线测试了WRF区域模式中的两种常用的近地层参数化方案(MM5相似理论非迭代方案A和ETA相似理论迭代方案B),并将参数化方案计算结果与边界层铁塔涡动相关法的观测值进行对比分析.在大理观象台观测场不同植被随季节交替的状况下,根据边界层铁塔4层高度风速拟合,发现近地层空气动力学粗糙度随季节变化特征明显.将拟合的空气动力学粗糙度输入模式参数化方案进行通量计算.结果表明:稳定度是影响近地层参数化方案精度的重要因素,在不稳定条件下方案B低估了动量通量,方案A优于方案B,而在稳定条件下方案A低估了动量通量,方案B优于方案A,两种方案总体来看误差不大.对于大理边界层通量观测场农田植被交替的环境条件,不同季节下垫面植被类型的差异,以及植被的稀疏对近地层参数化方案湍流通量计算结果的精度有显着影响.方案B考虑了空气动力学粗糙度z0和热量粗糙度z0h的差异,不稳定条件下感热通量计算结果在裸土或稀少植被条件下明显优于方案A.针对方案B不稳定条件下感热通量计算结果在裸土下垫面仍出现高估的现象,使用了Zeng等1998年提出的用辐射地表温度订正裸土下垫面感热能量方法后,计算结果也有明显改善.

     

    Abstract: Calculation of surface layer turbulent fluxes is very important for atmosphere numerical models.How to parameterizc the turbulent fluxes is one of the key research questions in current atmosphere boundary layer study.The paper uses two common schemes (MM5 similarity non-iterative Scheme A and ETA similarity iterative Scheme B) in the Weather Research Forecast Model (WRF) to make offline test and intercomparison of the parameterization results with the PBI.eddy-correlation obscrvation.The aerodynamic roughness length (z0)obtained on the Mali boundary layer is determined before calculating the turbulent fluxes.The aerodynamic roughness length (z0)by fitting four different heights wind speed from the Ptil.tower data under neutral condition varies significantly with season due to the obvious changes in underlaying surface conditions during the whole year (horsebcan in winter half year and paddy in summer half year).The results show that the vegetation sparseness degrec has a significant effect on turbulent fluxes calculation in the Mali cropland.In the unstable condition,Schcmc B undcrcstimates the momentum flux, and Scheme A is superior to Scheme B.Conversely, in the stable condition,Scheme A generates lower values with Scheme B is superior to Scheme A.On the whole,both of them produce little error.Scheme B takes account of the difference between aerodynamic roughness length (z0)and heat roughness length (z0h).The sensible heat flux result of Scheme B is much better than that of Scheme A,especially for the bare soil or sparse vegetation underlaying in the unstable condition.In case of bare soil the calculated sensible heat flux by Scheme B is still larger than the observation.The result is much better, if the (Geng, et al,1998)'s method using the radiometric surface temperature is adopted.

     

/

返回文章
返回