张晓惠, 倪允琪. 2009: 华南前汛期锋面对流系统与暖区对流系统的个例分析与对比研究. 气象学报, (1): 108-121. DOI: 10.11676/qxxb2009.012
引用本文: 张晓惠, 倪允琪. 2009: 华南前汛期锋面对流系统与暖区对流系统的个例分析与对比研究. 气象学报, (1): 108-121. DOI: 10.11676/qxxb2009.012
ZHANG Xiaohui, NI Yunqi. 2009: A comparative study of a frontal and a non-frontal convective systems. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, (1): 108-121. DOI: 10.11676/qxxb2009.012
Citation: ZHANG Xiaohui, NI Yunqi. 2009: A comparative study of a frontal and a non-frontal convective systems. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, (1): 108-121. DOI: 10.11676/qxxb2009.012

华南前汛期锋面对流系统与暖区对流系统的个例分析与对比研究

A comparative study of a frontal and a non-frontal convective systems

  • 摘要: 在2005年6月20日的一次华南暴雨过程中,影响两广地区局地强降水的两个主要的中尺度对流系统(MCS)在性质上有很大不同,初步分析断定,影响广西局地强降水的MCS1为锋面云团,而影响广东局地强降水的MCS2为暖性云团。通过对二者进行对流强度、维持机制以及湿位涡结构的比较分析发现,锋面对流系统MCS1与暖区对流系统MCS2的对流上升速度都很大,引起的局地降水量也相差不多。由于二者存在水汽条件的差异,因此不能排除微小差异主要是由水汽条件直接导致的,无法就此得出它们的对流强度强弱的比较结果;同时,对二者成熟阶段维持机制的对比分析得到,具有锋面特征的MCS1,中高层有很强的偏北气流进入,在对流区是以对流对称不稳定机制来维持对流运动的;而具有非锋面结构的MCS2由于没有偏北气流的进入,加上水汽条件充沛,主要由湿对流不稳定机制来维持对流运动。另外,湿位涡(MPV)结构的对比分析中得到如下结论:在 V MP 的结构上,二者均表现出中低层潜在对称不稳定结构特征;在 VMP 的结构上,锋面对流系统MCS1表现出南北气流相互作用的特征,而暖区对流系统MCS2表现出高低空气流相互作用的特征;最后,在VMP2 的结构上,MCS1反映了对流区南北两侧高低空急流的作用,而MCS2则反映了对流区内中高层干冷空气下滑的作用。

     

    Abstract: Tow major mesoscale convective clusters of different characters occurred in the heavy rainfall event in Guangxi and Guangdong Province on 20 June 2005, and they are preliminarily identified as a frontal mesoscale convective system (MCS1; a frontal cloud cluster) and a non-frontal MCS (MCS2; warm sector cloud cluster). Comparative analyses on their convection intensity, maintenance mechanism, and moist potential vorticity ( VMP) structure were performed. The MCS1 in Guangxi had a frontal structure, and there were strong northerly inflows at the middle and upper levels of the system. The convection intensity analysis suggests that the ascending motion in both the frontal MCS1 and warm sector MCS2 were strong, it is hard to conclude whether the intensity of the frontal convective cluster was stronger than that of the non-frontal convective cluster, and their difference in precipitation might result from differences in their moisture conditions. The comparative analysis of the maintenance mechanisms of matured MCS1 and MCS2 show that in the MCS1 there were northerly inflows in the middle and upper levels, the convection was mainly maintained through convective-symmetric instability mechanism; while in the MCS2, the water vapor was abundant, the convection was maintained by moist convective instability mechanism. The structural analysis of V MP indicates that (1) the V MP patterns imply that the two clusters were both potential symmetric unstable in the middle and low levels; (2) the distributions of V MP1 indicate that there were the interactions between the cold/dry air and the warm/wet air in the frontal MCS1, and the interactions between the upper level jet and the low level jet in the warm sector MCS2; (3) the different structures of V MP2 demonstrate that high-level jets, low-level jets and moisture nearby the convective clusters had different impacts on the two types of convective systems, respectively.

     

/

返回文章
返回