根据天气类型划分欧洲中期天气预报中心的集合预报产品

杨学胜; JeanNicolau; NicoleGirardot

doi:10.11676/qxxb2001.018

根据天气类型划分欧洲中期天气预报中心的集合预报产品

1.
国家气象中心, 北京, 100081
2.
法国气象局气象服务开发中心, Toulouse, 31057

基金项目:

法国国家奖学金项目

计量
- 文章访问数: 1993
- HTML全文浏览量: 37
- PDF下载量: 2423
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 1999-04-01
- 修回日期: 1999-05-16
- 发布日期: 2013-02-19

AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF THE PRODUCTS OF ECMWF ENSEMBLE PREDICTION SYSTEM ACCORDING TO THE WEATHER TYPES

1.
National Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081
2.
Service Central d’Exploitation de la Meteorologie, Meteo France, Toulouse 31057, France

摘要

摘要: 该研究的主要目的是找出一种对集合预报产品进行释用的新方法。其基本假定是集合预报要素在一定程度上代表了未来可能发生的天气形势。为了解决天气尺度在中期预报的不可预报性问题,引入了天气类型的概念。对集合预报进行划分的方法是Diday提出的动力模糊法,初始划分时的重心由天气类型定义,划分用到的距离是位移和最大相关方法。根据城市块(City-Block)距离找出了影响中国的按冬夏两季划分的天气类型,初步划分结果表明,欧洲中期天气预报中心的集合预报系统可以预报出横槽转竖型天气类型的演变情况,在夏天的预报效果则没有冬天好。
- 集合预报 /
- 自动划分 /
- 天气类型 /
- 位移和最大相关
Abstract: The main purpose of this paper was to presenta new method for interpretation of the products of ECMWF Ensem ble Prediction System(EPS). The basic assumption was that the EPS member srepresent, in a certain degree, the future weather situations. In order to resolve the problem that the synoptic scales are not predictable in the medium range, the conception of weather type was introduced. The approach for automatic clas-sification was Dynamic Fuzzy proposed by Diday, and a new distance called Displacement and Maximum Correlation was adapted. During the it eration, the initial gravity was defined by the weather types. In China, the weather types in summer and winter were determined by the automatic classification. The premier applications showed that EPS may predict the at mospheric evolution in winter, but the predict ability in summer was relatively poor.
- Ensemble prediction system(EPS) /
- Automatic classification /
- Weather type /
- Displacement and maximum correlation

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

Lorenze E N.Three ap proaches to atmos pheric predictability.Bull Ame Meteo Soc,1969,50:345～349 [2] Toth Z.Estimation of atmospheric predictability by circulation analogs.Mon Wea Rev,1991,119:65～72 [3] Epstein,Battisti E S.Stochastic dynamic prediction.Tellus,1969,21:739～759 [4] Leith C.Theoretical skill of Monte Carlo forecast.Mon Wea Rev,1974,102:409～418 [5] Molteni F,Buizza R,et al.The ECMW Fensemble prediction system:methodology and validation.Tech Mem,ECM WF,1994,1～52 [6] Tracton M S,Kalnay E.Ensemble forecast at NMC:Operational implemen tation.Wea Forecasting,1993,8:379～398 [7] Ward J H.Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function.J Amer Stat Assoc,1963,58:236～244 [8] Eckert P,Cattani D,M buhl A J.Assessment of ECMW Fensemble forecast with a Kohonen neural net work.1995,1～6 [9] Atger F.Tubing:analternative to clustering for ensemble predictioncl as sification.Wea.Forecasting,1999,114(5):741～757 [10] Vautard R.Multiple weather regimes over the north Atlantic analysis of precursors and successors.Mon Wea Rev,1990,118:2056～2081 [11] Blackm on M L,Lee Y H,Wallace J M.Horizontal structure of 500 mb height fluctuations with long,intermediate and short time scales.J Atmos Sci,1984,41(6):961～979 [12] User Guide to ECM W F Products,Ed2.1,M eteorological Bullet in M3.2,1995,ECMWF,Shifnield Park,Reading RG29AX,55～64 [13] Dupuy P,M ornte B,et al.Desponts,Guide d'exploitation moyenne echeance al'usage duprevisionniste.SCEM/PREVI/GEN E,M ET EO FR ANCE,1998,Tomel,V1.0,1～18 [14] Simmons A J,Burridge D M,et al.The ECMWF medium-range prediction model development of the numerical formulations and the impact of increas ed resolution.Meteor Atmos Phys.1989,40:28～60 [15] Courtier P.Freyde C,Geleyn J F.The ARPEGE project at METEO FRANCE.Proceedings of the ECMWF seminar on Numerical methods in at mospheric models,ECMWF,Shinfield Park,Reading U K,9-13 Sep.1991,2:192～231 [16] Diday E.Optimis ation enclas sification automatique etreconnaiss ancesde formes,Revue Francaise d' automatique,Informat iqueet Recherche Operat ionnelle,1972,3:61～96 [17] 章基嘉,葛玲.中长期天气预报基础.北京:气象出版社,1983.27～42